‘’However, let it be known that no Nigerian politician as things are can be a developmental agent.’’
By Jimanze Ego-Alowes
TUE, JUNE 11 2019-theG&BJournal-Just lately, a columnist, not personally known to this correspondent, penned a piece. It was titled how How Ambode Underdeveloped Lagos (I). https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2019/06/08/how-ambode-underdeveloped-lagos-i/
The gentleman, Yemi Adebowale, was right on point. But it would have served best if he broadened his list of the indicted. Actually that was how he started before he brought the focus heavily on Lagos and Ambode.
Our point is that Nigerian presidents, governors, etc. are agents of underdevelopment. And this is the norm in Nigeria. It is nothing peculiar to Lagos state or Ambode, in as much as both are in justice indicted.
The import of seeing the failure of governance beyond Lagos and Ambode is that we are led to admit it is a systems failure. And if it is, then to solve the problem of Lagos and Ambode we need to tweak the entire system, not the Lagos subsystem.
If this attitude is taken, then the point of how much Lagos receives or doesn’t from taxes and other revenues become a mute point. Development is not driven by money. In fact, development may be described as the movement from scarcity of assets including money, to its abundance. Development is least of all generated by money. All around the world there are too much money looking out for fecund ideas. If you got the right ideas the right tranche of money will seek you or your state out.
In other words, the question should not be why is Lagos underdeveloped despite trillions poured into her governance? The question should be why is Nigeria underdeveloped?
And if we sought answers, as honestly as we can, we did discover the worm is in our hearts. Nigeria’s systemic failures have nothing to do with leadership, with characters like Ambode or his Iberiberism counterpart in Owerri, etc. Players like Ambode and the Iberiberism man, are just opportunistic rashes on the skein of governance in Nigeria. The matter is simple, folks like Ambode, the Iberiberism man see an opportunity and they turn it into a political heists. They are not particularly evil people. They are just like the rest of us. Perhaps, none of us would have done really better. Yes, some of us could be marginally, repeat marginally, better than an Ambode. However, let it be known that no Nigerian politician as things are can be a developmental agent.
Immediately we get this, we are then half way to resolving the Nigerian conundrum. So what is Nigeria’s problem as is? It is a problem of how Nigeria is configured. But how Nigeria is configured is a consequence of our ignorance.
It may shock many to believe that Nigerians are a largely ignorant bunch. But that is what the data suggests. Take the issue of the Nigerian constitution for instance. The received wisdom is that the Nigerian constitution is a near clone of the American parent. But in truth it is no such thing. In fact the Nigerian constitution has no relationship in real terms with the American equivalent. What happened is that the crafters of our constitution were largely ignorant men.
And if you started with the ”basis constitution” or basis forgery – as was fixed by Chief Rotimi Williams and his hirers – it is clear Mr. Williams had no understanding of American constitutional history. We have treated this matter in more detailed form in our new book: The University Media Complex As Nigeria’s Foremost Amusement Center. And to help make things self-evident, we have un-gated a key excerpt.
Interestingly, the new excerpt explains in American historical terms why United Arab Emirates/UAE/Dubai is working, while Nigeria is not. It all boils down to our ignorance. It is a frightful charge to make, but the data, the historical facts, support the thesis. Nigeria is a playground of the ignorant in power. And this is both at the faculty and state houses levels.
For interested readers, the link is: https://africanomics.org/an-african-mind-rereads-aspects-of-american-constitutionalism/. Happy reading. Shalom.
Jimanze Ego-Alowes (PhD) is Author and public commentator
RE: Sanusi and Metuh: Princes of Power or Plebs in Need?
By Richard Ihediwa
I have read the article entitled “Sanusi and Metuh: Princes of Power or Plebs in Need?” by Jimanze Ego-Alowes, published on this column on Thursday, June 6, 2019.
It is indeed patronizing that in spite of the intent of the writer, it is a great credit to Chief Olisa Metuh, that as the former spokesman of a political party, he is being compared side by side in deep pocket dispensation of largesse with a former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), HRM. Sanusi Lamido, the Emir of Kano, in their current travails.
First, His Highness, Emir Sanusi was a Chief Executive of the Central Bank, (almost on equal pedestal with Chairman of United States Federal Reserve) who had a large capacity to dish out goodwill in appointments, promotions, contracts and expend largesse, including financial aids to institutions; Chief Metuh, on the other hand, was a spokesperson of a political party, whose duty was only to propagate the position of his party with little or no budget.
Perhaps the comparison to the highly respected Emir Sanusi is spurred by the successes recorded by Metuh, who, out of sheer commitment and patriotic zeal, elevated the person and office of a party spokesperson to an unprecedented relevance in national discourse and dynamics of governance.
Besides, Emir Sanusi is not on trial in court but Chief Metuh was arrested, paraded in handcuffs, viciously portrayed as a criminal and the face of corruption; and being embattled in court, it is expected that commentators would be circumspect in lending support as the matter is already subjudice.
While Chief Metuh’s matter, being subjudice, will not allow for extensive commentary, His Highness, Emir Sanusi’s issue is a squabble with one out of the thirty-six state governors and it is not subjudice.
Nonetheless, it is on record that a lot of eminent Nigerians and elders of our nation, prominent lawyers, cultural groups, the PDP at both the national, zonal and state levels have expressed opinions pointing at persecution and unfair treatment.
Moreover, Ego-Alowes missed it completely as those close to Chief Metuh know that there is no way he would have survived in the last three years of his travail, with his bank accounts frozen and sources of livelihood grounded, but for the goodwill he enjoys from the vast array of friends, associates, and supporters from various parts of the country, including persons in office today, who have been quite supportive in this regard.
It is also worthy of note that Chief Metuh was the longest serving national officer of the PDP, having risen from being an ex-officio member to National Auditor to National Vice Chairman and then the National Publicity Secretary, spanning a period of 17 years. Pray, could he have achieved and sustained these political levels without immense goodwill from across the nation?
From all material evidence, even from the said article, Chief Metuh’s stewardship as the PDP spokesperson was not characterized by wasteful spending, mercantilism and bazaars but by delivery on mandate with lean resources.
It is incontrovertible that Chief Metuh achieved a very extensive and robust media synergy as chief publicist of the PDP. Such could not have been, without teamwork and healthy relationships.
Reading through the unwarranted attack on Chief Metuh and being familiar with his present ordeal, it is obvious that the former PDP Spokesman is a victim of misrepresentations by those who hold the megaphone to spur bad press and public opprobrium, as in the case of the article in question.
It is therefore very unfortunate that Ego-Alowes’s anger with Chief Metuh is that he did not surrender the funds for the special national assignment given to him.
Because of such distortions, many Nigerians do not actually understand the issues of Chief Metuh’s travail. Misinformed writers took center stage and media trial beclouded facts.
Those who are conversant with the case know that Chief Metuh is not being charged for corrupt enrichment or for stealing of public funds but that the N400 million paid into his account was used to fund campaign activities of the PDP.
The question will then be whether the money was spent for the purpose for which it was released?
Giving account of the N400 million in court, Chief Metuh had tendered documents to show that the entire N400 million was expended in execution of the national assignment and that no part was used for the campaign activity of the PDP as alleged.
Chief Metuh also tendered records of accounts detailing disbursements, names and signatures of individuals who received funds in execution of the assignment as well as a copy of the final accounts which detailed the project items, subheads and payments.
Even in his travail, Chief Metuh has maintained a rare commitment to relationship and the good of others. In tendering the documents, he had explained his hesitation to give out the names of those who worked under him in the execution of the assignment, made up of respected professionals in various fields, including university lecturers, who he did not want to be subjected to the embarrassment of sensational negative media report and misrepresentations at the time.
In his words, “it was for this reason that I insisted that if there are any questions, repercussions, refunds or persecution to be suffered in that regard, it should be directed to me personally. That is the concept of leadership”.
Many Nigerians have commended, Metuh for standing tall and bearing his travails and tribulations with equanimity, courage and dignity. Such leadership traits are rare and can only applauded and celebrated but not condemned.
In truth, Chief Metuh’s travail is an exemplification that legality is indeed a matter of power not justice.
Richard Ihediwa was Special Assistant to Chief Olisa Metuh As National Publicity Secretary
twitter:@theGBJournal|email: info@govandbusinessjournal.com.ng|
